Evidence-bound assurance
for consequential AI.
See what your AI can do. Establish what it is allowed to do. Trace the evidence behind the decision.
A passing scan or valid permission is not the final decision
AI can act across applications, APIs, data, infrastructure, customer state, and regulated workflows. Leadership needs to know which boundary each piece of evidence actually establishes.
What do we intend this AI to do?
What operating authority has the organization approved?
What can its credentials and connected systems permit?
What can the application technically do?
What has actually been observed?
Where do those boundaries disagree?
Serious assurance does not turn missing evidence into a green check. Unknown is a boundary on the claim, not something to hide.
See where approved access and available authority diverge
Follow one consequential action from request to outcome while keeping intent, policy, application capability, system authority, and observed evidence distinct.
AI Action & Access Map
One request, two operating boundaries, one material difference.
What the organization may know afterward
Outputs depend on the evaluated scope and evidence actually available. Nothing below converts an unavailable source into an established claim.
Evaluated Scope
Action & Access Analysis
Evidence Coverage
Material Divergence
Evidence-Gap Plan
Decision Receipt
Productized platform access and bespoke assurance solve different problems
| Dimension | HAIEC Platform | Enterprise Assurance POC |
|---|---|---|
| Starting motion | Self-service | Founder-led scoping |
| System boundary | Supported product workflow | Explicit enterprise boundary |
| Evidence path | Standard integrations and rule packs | Minimum Sufficient Access plan |
| Operating policy | Standard workflow | Organization-specific operating boundary |
| Acceptance criteria | Productized | Agreed POC decision criteria |
| Output | Standard platform results | Executive and technical decision readout |
| Commercial model | Subscription | $25,000 to $75,000 scoped engagement |
| Checkout | Available on HAIEC.com | No checkout. Qualification first. |
Begin with the strongest bounded claim the available evidence can support
Complete source and runtime access is not required to begin scoping. Missing evidence is identified, not ignored.
Repository and artifacts
Authority and environment
Behavioral evidence
Enterprise POC is not the only path
Design Partner
For selected organizations helping qualify assurance workflows against representative enterprise systems. Not a free beta.
Explore Design Partnership →Partner & Agency
For security firms, consultancies, MSPs, integrators, and technology partners evaluating repeat delivery or evidence integration.
Discuss Partner Access →Developer & Open Source
Independent developers and maintainers can begin with a repository, package, schema, test environment, or representative artifact.
Submit a Project or Repository →Permission is not delegation
HAIEC research examines whether an authorized system action was actually delegated, which effects are possible, and what evidence is required to support that claim. Research direction is not presented as current universal proof capability.